
by Tara Pringle Jefferson
By now, we all (or most of us) know the details of the affair South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford had with his Argentinan “soul mate,” leaving his wife, kids, and constituents in his home state wondering where the heck their leader went.
In her new book, Jenny Sanford, Mark’s ex-wife, details how he declined to include a clause on fidelity in their marriage vows. “It bothered me to some extent, but we were very young, we were in love,” she said in an Barbara Walters interview. “I questioned it, but I got past it.”
Obviously, it sucks to be her right now. Or even back then, really, from the sounds of it. You’ve got to be crushed when your husband has an affair, and then gets caught, and THEN you have to relive it over and over in the news.
BUT – Mark Sanford never promised to be faithful to his wife. He made it a point to cut that part out of the vows. Homegirl knew up front what it was. If she chose to believe he really meant he would be faithful when he was, in fact, quite clearly saying, “I’m gonna leave myself a little wiggle room, okay?” then who’s fault is it?
Does marriage, by its very definition, include fidelity, and no omission of the “f-word” can erase that? Or can marriages be open and flexible, as long as both parties agree to the terms and conditions?
So what say you – is a marriage still a marriage if one or both parties aren’t planning to be faithful?
Tara Pringle Jefferson is a freelance writer living in Ohio with her husband and two children. Visit her blog, www.theyoungmommylife.com, to read more of her observations about life, motherhood and love.