
by Aja Dorsey Jackson
In the wake of what seems like weekly high profile affairs between married men and talkative mistresses I have had the unfortunate opportunity to tune into various radio shows with DJs and callers voicing their opinions on the topic. What disturbs me about these conversations is that rather than acknowledging the devastation that participating in an affair can cause marriages and families, more often than not the only problem that many people seem to have is with the other woman for not knowing her place and neglecting to abide by the side-chick rules.
What are these “other woman” rules? According to most, it seems that the other woman is to know her place on the outside and not to ruin the man’s family by letting his wife or anyone else know about the affair. Every time I hear this I am always left wondering why anyone would believe that these rules actually exist.
If you have no respect for God’s rules or the rules of the law as they pertain to marriage, what would give you the faulty idea that rules can be observed or applied to anything in else the situation. No concern existed on the part of the spouse or the mistress for wrecking the marriage when they entered into the affair; why then, would the other woman (Or man) be concerned with ruining the marriage by speaking about the infidelity. There is no such thing as applying rules to foolishness. When you engage in an affair, you have already decided to break your commitment to the rules because you felt like doing something else at the time. Your behavior is determined by how you feel, not by your commitments. When your feelings change, so do the rules. If what I am saying is untrue, why have we seen this played out in the media time and time again? Silence was golden as long as the other person in the scenario was reaping some type of reward. Once that person no longer felt the same, for whatever reason, they wanted to talk. As opposed to trying to craft irrelevant rules for affairs, it seems that it would be much more effective to abide by the ones that were already given in the marriage vows.
It’s like watching little kids play cards. They make up the rules as they go along. Someone gets mad, someone’s feelings get hurt and the rules change. In the end, nobody wins.
Am I right or just naïve? Is there truly a such thing as applying rules to indiscretion?
Aja Dorsey Jackson is a freelance writer and public relations consultant in Baltimore, Maryland. Find out more about her at www.ajadorseyjackson.com or follow her on twitter @ajajackson.